Books The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2) Free Download

Define Books In Favor Of The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

Original Title:	Histoire de la sexualité 2. l'usage des plaisirs
ISBN:	0394751221 (ISBN13: 9780394751221)
Edition Language:	English
Series:	The History of Sexuality #2

The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

Michel Foucault

Paperback | Pages: 304 pages

Rating: 4.07 | 3305 Users | 99 Reviews

Representaion During Books The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

In this sequel to The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction, the brilliantly original French thinker who died in 1984 gives an analysis of how the ancient Greeks perceived sexuality.

Throughout The Uses of Pleasure Foucault analyzes an irresistible array of ancient Greek texts on eroticism as he tries to answer basic questions: How in the West did sexual experience become a moral issue? And why were other appetites of the body, such as hunger, and collective concerns, such as civic duty, not subjected to the numberless rules and regulations and judgments that have defined, if not confined, sexual behavior?

Details Epithetical Books The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

Title	:	The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)
Author	:	Michel Foucault
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	First Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 304 pages
Published	:	1990 by Vintage (first published 1984)
Categories	:	Philosophy. Nonfiction. History. Theory. Sexuality. Sociology

Rating Epithetical Books The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

Ratings: 4.07 From 3305 Users | 99 Reviews

Judge Epithetical Books The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

First I should note that I am not really concerned with the accuracy of Foucault's interpretations of ancient Greek texts or even with sexuality as a topic of study. I'm not a Classicist so I can't comment on the empirical validity of the work. However, I am interested in understanding the truly original aspects of his work, mainly his theory of power, subjectivity, and the concept of discourse. In The History of Sexuality 1: An Introduction Foucault provides us with a sketch of his notion of

The purpose here is not to write a history of sexual behaviors and practices, nor analyze the scientific, religious, or philosophical ideas related to them, but rather to examine that quite recent and banal notion of sexuality: to stand detached from it, bracket its familiarity, in order to analyze the theoretical and practical context with which it has been associated (3). So, a husserlian reduction of sexuality into its archaeological context. Recognizing that purported individuals decipher,

This was a lot more interesting than volume one. The subtitle should have been "The Use of Pleasure in Ancient Greece" or "Same-sex Sexuality in Ancient Greece" or something along those lines.If Foucault had set a broader scope -- let alone settle with modern, and less-obfuscating terminology -- he would have summarily concluded the following:"It is important to emphasize that people who engage in same-sex sexual practices do not necessarily have a homosexual orientation. The same-sex sexual act

The introduction to The Use of Pleasure, the second volume in Michel Foucaults History of Sexuality, promises a lot. Refocusing from his well worn conception of power networks to desire and the desiring subject (5), Michel suggests his study will combine his two previous modes of scholarship--the archaeologies of the 1960s and the genealogies of the 1970s--in a single volume. This is, he says, a work of philosophy that uses fourth-century BCE practical historical texts to construct, again, the

This is some deep genealogy, something that is a far cry from the more wild, theoretical-level writings of the young Foucault. He turns his attentions to the Greeks, arguing that they viewed sexuality more in terms of dietetic regimen, one to be conformed with for maximum health. A point which he repeats ad nauseam. Now, I enjoyed the examples given but -- and this shouldnt be a surprise given Foucault's rather androcentric view of sex -- he seems to leave female desire almost completely out of

The purpose here is not to write a history of sexual behaviors and practices, nor analyze the scientific, religious, or philosophical ideas related to them, but rather to examine that quite recent and banal notion of sexuality: to stand detached from it, bracket its familiarity, in order to analyze the theoretical and practical context with which it has been associated (3). So, a husserlian reduction of sexuality into its archaeological context. Recognizing that purported individuals decipher,

In this, it is proved that sexuality (or rather the frequency of its practice, and between whom) was not considered to be a moral sin as it is indicated in Judeo-Christian (and even current) mores. But sexuality was so closely intertwined with asceticism within Greek culture that to practice a sort of dietetics was necessary in order to be considered a capable man; to know when, how, how often, who to practice ones sexuality on was indicative of ones ability to be a functioning political actor.