Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Blade Runner #1)
The first mistake that a new reader would make is to watch Blade Runner and expect a novelization of that film; it was LOOSELY based upon the book. I'm a big fan of the Ridley Scott film starring Harrison Ford and Rutger Hauer, but the movie diverged from Phillip K. Dick's literature early on. The book is far more bleak than the film, if you can believe that, and much more intricate and complicated. Blade Runner benefits from a simplified storyline.
The author was far ahead of his time both in the complexity of his story and the perspective from which he writes. There are elements of Brave New World, I, Robot, and Dune; but the author has a unique voice and the story is an original. It is not an excellent work, as there are gaps and inconsistencies and many loose ends that are never tied in, but the concept and provocation are superb.
One element of the book that was completely left out of the film was a sub-plot involving a Christ-like messiah and a faith system based upon what could have been a hoax. First published in 1968, this was one of his more theological based novels, and a trend that would continue steadily becoming more frequent and invasive until the end of his writing.
A MUST read for PKD fans as well as SF/F fans period.
Living in a college dorm, subsisting on a diet heavy in beer and mood altering drugs, and not having seen the film Blade Runner or its excellent sequel aren't necessarily requirements for enjoying Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, the celebrated science fiction novel by Philip K. Dick, but they would help. So would a time machine. Published in 1968, this novel, like much of the late author's work, has become a victim of its own success, farmed out to film and television and also picked clean
I'd watched Blade Runner several times, but hadn't read Philip K. Dick's Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. The book and movie don't entirely match up, but they are both thought-provoking and entertaining in their own right. Fans of the film will notice serious discrepancies in the book as I did (and vice versa). Still, they somehow compliment each other. That's not a common response when I read a book after watching a film, or more commonly watching a film after reading the book. Before
An android walks into a bar."Hey!", the bartender says, "Only people with feelings are allowed in here! You need empathy in order to be in a joke like this, or at least have something people can relate to.""Oh, don't worry", the android replies, "I definitely feel empathy."Relieved, the bartender invites him over to the bar. "What are you having?""A beer would be great!", the android replies. The bartender, evidently approving of this fine choice, gladly obliges and goes on to cater for the
This is the book Blade Runner was based on. Which is why I decided to read it. You might think this was a bad idea on my part. You might be right.This novel is a cult classic. You're supposed to love cult classics right? Right. Well guess what? Not only did I not love this book, it pretty much bored me to death, too. Yay.Don't get me wrong, this book is somewhat brilliant. Well, okay, if it had actually been brilliant I'd obviously have given it a 4-star rating. So let's just say this book is
I could say that I love Dick, but that would be weird. I do very much enjoy Philip K. Dick's writing and though this is not one of his best, the "Pizza and Sex Rule" applies to him; ie. just as even bad pizza and / or sex is still pretty good, bad PKD is as well. And this is not bad at all. The first mistake that a new reader would make is to watch Blade Runner and expect a novelization of that film; it was LOOSELY based upon the book. I'm a big fan of the Ridley Scott film starring Harrison
Is Deckard an android?"An android," he said, "doesn't care what happens to another android. That's one of the indications we look for.""Then," Miss Luft said, "you must be an android."That stopped him; he stared at her.This is all I could think about when reading. I really looked for evidence to back the idea up, though the novel only provided me with speculation and partial facts. For every little suggestion in the text that he is a robot, there is an effective counter argument. Somehow,
Philip K. Dick
Kindle Edition | Pages: 258 pages Rating: 4.08 | 319918 Users | 12278 Reviews
List Books Toward Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Blade Runner #1)
Original Title: | Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? ASIN B000SEGTI0 |
Edition Language: | English |
Series: | Blade Runner #1 |
Characters: | Rick Deckard, John Isidore, Roy Baty, Rachael Rosen, Iran Deckard, Phil Resch, Luba Luft, Bill Barbour, Pris Stratton, Hannibal Sloat, Irmgard Baty, Inspector Garland, Max Polokov, Wilbur Mercer, Buster Friendly, Al Jarry |
Setting: | San Francisco, California(United States) California(United States) United States of America |
Literary Awards: | Nebula Award Nominee for Best Novel (1968) |
Interpretation Conducive To Books Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Blade Runner #1)
I could say that I love Dick, but that would be weird. I do very much enjoy Philip K. Dick's writing and though this is not one of his best, the "Pizza and Sex Rule" applies to him; ie. just as even bad pizza and / or sex is still pretty good, bad PKD is as well. And this is not bad at all.The first mistake that a new reader would make is to watch Blade Runner and expect a novelization of that film; it was LOOSELY based upon the book. I'm a big fan of the Ridley Scott film starring Harrison Ford and Rutger Hauer, but the movie diverged from Phillip K. Dick's literature early on. The book is far more bleak than the film, if you can believe that, and much more intricate and complicated. Blade Runner benefits from a simplified storyline.
The author was far ahead of his time both in the complexity of his story and the perspective from which he writes. There are elements of Brave New World, I, Robot, and Dune; but the author has a unique voice and the story is an original. It is not an excellent work, as there are gaps and inconsistencies and many loose ends that are never tied in, but the concept and provocation are superb.
One element of the book that was completely left out of the film was a sub-plot involving a Christ-like messiah and a faith system based upon what could have been a hoax. First published in 1968, this was one of his more theological based novels, and a trend that would continue steadily becoming more frequent and invasive until the end of his writing.
A MUST read for PKD fans as well as SF/F fans period.
Particularize Appertaining To Books Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Blade Runner #1)
Title | : | Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Blade Runner #1) |
Author | : | Philip K. Dick |
Book Format | : | Kindle Edition |
Book Edition | : | First Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 258 pages |
Published | : | February 26th 2008 by Ballantine Books (first published January 1968) |
Categories | : | Fantasy. Fiction. Horror. Science Fiction |
Rating Appertaining To Books Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Blade Runner #1)
Ratings: 4.08 From 319918 Users | 12278 ReviewsEvaluation Appertaining To Books Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Blade Runner #1)
Raise your hand if you saw my name next to a five star rating and thought you were dreaming. Dreaming of electric sheep. Boom. Ohhhhhhhhhhh baby. How have I not read this until now? Why havent I seen Blade Runner before? Why?! Why?! Whyyyyyyyyyyy.........Everything about this book is just, just, so... just so... everything about this book, man, this book, its just so... it is. This book. Awesome. This book is awesome. Words Im trying to eliminate from my vocabulary: man, awesome, cool, legit,Living in a college dorm, subsisting on a diet heavy in beer and mood altering drugs, and not having seen the film Blade Runner or its excellent sequel aren't necessarily requirements for enjoying Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, the celebrated science fiction novel by Philip K. Dick, but they would help. So would a time machine. Published in 1968, this novel, like much of the late author's work, has become a victim of its own success, farmed out to film and television and also picked clean
I'd watched Blade Runner several times, but hadn't read Philip K. Dick's Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. The book and movie don't entirely match up, but they are both thought-provoking and entertaining in their own right. Fans of the film will notice serious discrepancies in the book as I did (and vice versa). Still, they somehow compliment each other. That's not a common response when I read a book after watching a film, or more commonly watching a film after reading the book. Before
An android walks into a bar."Hey!", the bartender says, "Only people with feelings are allowed in here! You need empathy in order to be in a joke like this, or at least have something people can relate to.""Oh, don't worry", the android replies, "I definitely feel empathy."Relieved, the bartender invites him over to the bar. "What are you having?""A beer would be great!", the android replies. The bartender, evidently approving of this fine choice, gladly obliges and goes on to cater for the
This is the book Blade Runner was based on. Which is why I decided to read it. You might think this was a bad idea on my part. You might be right.This novel is a cult classic. You're supposed to love cult classics right? Right. Well guess what? Not only did I not love this book, it pretty much bored me to death, too. Yay.Don't get me wrong, this book is somewhat brilliant. Well, okay, if it had actually been brilliant I'd obviously have given it a 4-star rating. So let's just say this book is
I could say that I love Dick, but that would be weird. I do very much enjoy Philip K. Dick's writing and though this is not one of his best, the "Pizza and Sex Rule" applies to him; ie. just as even bad pizza and / or sex is still pretty good, bad PKD is as well. And this is not bad at all. The first mistake that a new reader would make is to watch Blade Runner and expect a novelization of that film; it was LOOSELY based upon the book. I'm a big fan of the Ridley Scott film starring Harrison
Is Deckard an android?"An android," he said, "doesn't care what happens to another android. That's one of the indications we look for.""Then," Miss Luft said, "you must be an android."That stopped him; he stared at her.This is all I could think about when reading. I really looked for evidence to back the idea up, though the novel only provided me with speculation and partial facts. For every little suggestion in the text that he is a robot, there is an effective counter argument. Somehow,
0 comments:
Post a Comment