The Civil War, Vol. 1: Fort Sumter to Perryville (The Civil War #1)
I first read this definitive 3 volume series when Ruth was a newborn in 2001. I fondly recall these books in my lap alongside my sleeping baby girl, woodstove heating our den cozily, while a heavy February snow quilted the word outside. Those were magical times, and I wondered if my impressions of these works were skewed favorably as a result.Well, I just finished re-reading volume 1, and I enjoyed Mr Foote's eloquent prose every bit as much, though my house is now filled with three rambunctious
Shelby Foote would be considered by many Civil War readers to be the greatest writer on the subject. He considered himself to be a historian but not an academic, and his extremely detailed knowledge of the Civil War coupled with his straight-forward writing style have produced works which have fascinated readers for decades. This book is part of a trilogy of books that Foote wrote over a period of about 20 years. He came about the project originally after publication of his novel "Shiloh" in the
I have an allergy to Shelby Foote. I care for neither his prose style nor his biased viewpoint.Many years ago, Douglas Southall Freeman, the author of Lee's Lieutenants, told his friend Clifford Dowdey (another Civil War author), that he often suppressed his real opinions about the generals in his histories. Freeman explained this was because his sources were the children and grandchildren (many of them Freeman's personal friends) of the men he wrote about in his books, and the real story of the
Magnificent. Awe inspiring historical writing. As gripping a narrative as any I've found in literature. As insightful a work of strategy as any I've found in the academy. Foote shows the friction and confusion of war as well as any piece I've encountered. All that extra space enables him to take the character's stories to their full conclusion, rather than just passing off stage as their relation to the main story ends. Learning about some of the smaller, less vital campaigns was just as
It is amazing to me that this book was written more than half a century ago, when its author Shelby Foote was still a young man. Most histories of the Civil War that I know pretty much concentrate on the four-year duel between the Army of the Potomac under McClellan (et al. ad infinitum) and the Army of Northern Virginia under Lee. Admittedly, the Old Dominion State had more than its share of bloody battles; but it wasn't the whole shooting match, so to speak. Even while Lee and his opponent du
I would like to have given this book 4 and a half stars although obviously that is not possible. I do not understand the misspellings in the book- was there no editor or some hidden reason for it? Still, I was drawn to Foote's writing. His appreciation and dedication to the history he was writing was obvious and his evenhandedness apparent. This book is very easy reading so I would recommend it even to those not normally drawn to history. I was a bit annoyed by the lack of footnotes which make a
Shelby Foote
Paperback | Pages: 856 pages Rating: 4.43 | 10854 Users | 439 Reviews
Identify Books Toward The Civil War, Vol. 1: Fort Sumter to Perryville (The Civil War #1)
Original Title: | The Civil War: A Narrative, Vol 1: Fort Sumter to Perryville |
ISBN: | 0394746236 (ISBN13: 9780394746234) |
Edition Language: | English |
Series: | The Civil War #1 |
Literary Awards: | National Book Award Finalist for Nonfiction (1959) |
Relation Supposing Books The Civil War, Vol. 1: Fort Sumter to Perryville (The Civil War #1)
The Civil War: A Narrative, Vol. 1 begins one of the most remarkable works of history ever fashioned. All the great battles are here, of course, from Bull Run through Shiloh, the Seven Days Battles, and Antietam, but so are the smaller ones: Ball's Bluff, Fort Donelson, Pea Ridge, Island Ten, New Orleans, and Monitor versus Merrimac. The word "narrative" is the key to this extraordinary book's incandescence and its truth. The story is told entirely from the point of view of the people involved in it. One learns not only what was happening on all fronts but also how the author discovered it during his years of exhaustive research. This first volume in Shelby Foote's comprehensive history is a must-listen for anyone interested in one of the bloodiest wars in America's history.Declare About Books The Civil War, Vol. 1: Fort Sumter to Perryville (The Civil War #1)
Title | : | The Civil War, Vol. 1: Fort Sumter to Perryville (The Civil War #1) |
Author | : | Shelby Foote |
Book Format | : | Paperback |
Book Edition | : | Deluxe Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 856 pages |
Published | : | November 12th 1986 by Vintage (first published November 12th 1958) |
Categories | : | History. Military History. Civil War. Nonfiction. North American Hi.... American History. American Civil War. Audiobook. War |
Rating About Books The Civil War, Vol. 1: Fort Sumter to Perryville (The Civil War #1)
Ratings: 4.43 From 10854 Users | 439 ReviewsJudge About Books The Civil War, Vol. 1: Fort Sumter to Perryville (The Civil War #1)
Fascinating and very readable and informative - think I shall leave writing a full review until I have read volumes 2 and 3 though (which may be later this year as they are even longer than this one which is over 800 pages).I first read this definitive 3 volume series when Ruth was a newborn in 2001. I fondly recall these books in my lap alongside my sleeping baby girl, woodstove heating our den cozily, while a heavy February snow quilted the word outside. Those were magical times, and I wondered if my impressions of these works were skewed favorably as a result.Well, I just finished re-reading volume 1, and I enjoyed Mr Foote's eloquent prose every bit as much, though my house is now filled with three rambunctious
Shelby Foote would be considered by many Civil War readers to be the greatest writer on the subject. He considered himself to be a historian but not an academic, and his extremely detailed knowledge of the Civil War coupled with his straight-forward writing style have produced works which have fascinated readers for decades. This book is part of a trilogy of books that Foote wrote over a period of about 20 years. He came about the project originally after publication of his novel "Shiloh" in the
I have an allergy to Shelby Foote. I care for neither his prose style nor his biased viewpoint.Many years ago, Douglas Southall Freeman, the author of Lee's Lieutenants, told his friend Clifford Dowdey (another Civil War author), that he often suppressed his real opinions about the generals in his histories. Freeman explained this was because his sources were the children and grandchildren (many of them Freeman's personal friends) of the men he wrote about in his books, and the real story of the
Magnificent. Awe inspiring historical writing. As gripping a narrative as any I've found in literature. As insightful a work of strategy as any I've found in the academy. Foote shows the friction and confusion of war as well as any piece I've encountered. All that extra space enables him to take the character's stories to their full conclusion, rather than just passing off stage as their relation to the main story ends. Learning about some of the smaller, less vital campaigns was just as
It is amazing to me that this book was written more than half a century ago, when its author Shelby Foote was still a young man. Most histories of the Civil War that I know pretty much concentrate on the four-year duel between the Army of the Potomac under McClellan (et al. ad infinitum) and the Army of Northern Virginia under Lee. Admittedly, the Old Dominion State had more than its share of bloody battles; but it wasn't the whole shooting match, so to speak. Even while Lee and his opponent du
I would like to have given this book 4 and a half stars although obviously that is not possible. I do not understand the misspellings in the book- was there no editor or some hidden reason for it? Still, I was drawn to Foote's writing. His appreciation and dedication to the history he was writing was obvious and his evenhandedness apparent. This book is very easy reading so I would recommend it even to those not normally drawn to history. I was a bit annoyed by the lack of footnotes which make a
0 comments:
Post a Comment